Monday, September 22, 2008

Contemporary Craft: Non-Functional or Dysfunctional?

By: Jon Sutter, Graduate Student in Wood
At: VCU, Department of Media-based Art and Design


Contrary to what many artists think, I believe that aesthetic choices in art are wholly suffused with the economic circumstances of life. This is nowhere more evident than in the field of contemporary craft. I am a woodworker and a craftsman who has spent many years learning his skills. So it pains me to say this, sort-of. However, craft is pretty much dead. Maybe it’s not all dead. There’s still a little bit kicking around, but, by and large, it’s breathing its last breaths. Contemporary craft has lost its main purpose for being and has devolved into a form of media-based sculpture. Both the recent dropping of the word “crafts” from the name “California College of Arts and Crafts,” as well as the renaming of the “American Craft Museum” to the “Museum of Art and Design,” exemplify recent shifts toward an honest acknowledgement of the state of craft. This is also exemplified in the proliferation of non-functional craft work.

What does it say when a functional item cannot be used? Let’s say we have a chair. The chair is made like a chair, displays the fabrication methods and the skilled labor of a chair, but cannot be used. Is this chair a sculpture? Perhaps it is. However, I would argue that it is also the symbolic and final degeneration of a field of endeavor that has become obsolete. This is craft that embodies its own tragedy, the symbolic death of the craftsman’s relevancy to culture. Because craft’s traditional usefulness has become depleted, the motivations of contemporary craft artists have begun to align with the motivations of fine artists. Because these motivations are nearly identical, the field of contemporary craft has taken up the same preoccupation with concept and theory that typifies the practice of modern fine art. How woeful it is that craft artists need to concern themselves with a “Theory of Craft.” Unfortunately, theory will never resuscitate that which has died by economics.

William Morris complained, more than a century ago, about his work finding an audience only among the well-off. He wouldn’t have been able to make his work if he hadn’t come from a wealthy family. Industrial culture doesn’t need art in the way it needs the things of everyday life. And the things of everyday life are made less expensively (and often better) by the methods of mass production. Granted, mass produced products don’t carry the uniqueness of a handmade item. However, when shopping for value, the cost benefit of manufactured goods far exceeds that of handmade ones. Therefore, the traditional role of the craftsman, someone who provides his/her community with the items needed for everyday life, has nearly ended. Without strong consumer demand for handcrafted items that can compete in the market with manufactured goods, where else but into theory, introspection, and self expression can the virtuosic energies of craft artisans go?

Of course, there are plenty of people who will disagree with me, who will claim that it is their personal vision that drives their creative work. I believe it is their personal vision. However, without very specific economic circumstances, the making of hand-crafted work, functional or nonfunctional, would not be possible. In fact, it is my assertion that the career of most craft artists will end on the day they graduate from their craft program. It will end the day their student loan payments become due. Otherwise, some alternative form of financial support is required. They may hang on for a while, but only a lucky few will find long-term employment in the field of contemporary craft or will be able to develop a viable niche market for their work.

My own graduate study in the field of crafts asks what can be done about these economic circumstances. I am focusing on the niche market. Craft, particularly furniture-making, requires the same space and tools of a regular business. In order to truly survive outside of academia, craft artists need to study the business aspects of what they do. Because of their high price, craft items necessarily serve a luxury market. However, which luxury market they serve could be the difference between losing money and being profitable. I believe that new technologies can make crafts a somewhat profitable endeavor once again. For woodworking, software tools like AutoCAD combined with newly developed low-cost CNC routers may make artisan furniture a viable enterprise. Custom furniture will never compete with low-cost, imported furniture, but it may be possible to develop a niche furniture business that utilizes these newly developed tools and caters to a market that isn’t only “the rich.”

The question for every craft artist who aspires to sell his/her work is this: “How do I create value in the work I make.” This could be work of technical virtuosity, or “green” work, or work that is interesting and unique, or work which steps into the realm of sculpture. However, work which does not find a sufficient niche market and is supported financially by the artist can only be someone’s pet project. The work may be fine art, may be significant in some way to a cultural dialog, but, in the true and traditional sense of craft that serves the utilitarian needs of a culture, its purpose for being is mostly gone. In addition, the traditional skills that exemplify the best work are going as well.

Skill, however, is relative always to the task at hand. As traditional skills die away, others are created. Today’s craft artists, in addition to the “hard” skills needed to make their work, must also master the skills of marketing, sales, and other “soft” skills to gain and maintain a market presence. Those whose success carries them beyond a niche market will inevitably find themselves in the realm of product design and will need to turn to outright manufacturing. Those whose work is celebrated and widely popular, who don’t pursue manufacturing, may find their ideas stolen by the likes of Target or others who are willing to utilize manufacturing to its fullest. Whether craft artisans are willing and able to use manufacturing to their advantage, or whether their livelihood will continue to be destroyed by it, remains a challenge for the field as a whole.

3 comments:

art and wonder said...

Wow! I think that you have an op-ed piece here. I cannot say that I agree with you, but I can see how passionately you feel about this subject. As your entry speaks mainly from a wood/furniture perspective, I thought that I would share a bit of my perspective of how the ceramics field has changed—perhaps I can open new possibilities in your thinking.

Fifty years ago ceramists started infusing the practice of their work with ideas and attitudes from the fields of painting and sculpture. Roe Slivka (the editor of Craft Horizons magazine) celebrated this work in her landmark article The New Ceramic Presence. This is a must read not only for ceramists, but for anyone interested in craft criticism. The article championed Peter Voulkos among others and suggested the beginnings of a revolution in ceramics. I like to think that the article predicted all craft fields as well.

I may not know much about economics, but I know enough about craft to say that there is room for many attitudes toward making. And more importantly—artists keep redefining the field and finding new and interesting ways to work. I think this is an exciting time to be working in the field of craft. The bonds with tradition have been severed. Anything is possible!

Thanks for this thought provoking post-I hope that you try to publish this!

Unknown said...

To follow the previous comment, after reading this Jon I wanted to ask if you would consider posting it on my other blog, conceptual metalsmithing. I have been looking for other contributors, and this is a good article. Maybe find an image to go with it?

Anyhow, I think you nailed it here: when shopping for value, the cost benefit of manufactured goods far exceeds that of handmade ones. Therefore, the traditional role of the craftsman, someone who provides his/her community with the items needed for everyday life, has nearly ended.

I think I am coming to the same conclusion that if I want my work so support me (I don't think it will) I must cater to the rich. My current work is based on market analysis and intends to use an imperative to drive its sales. I am not for catering to the rich, but we are clever enough to subvert or rationalize any problems we may have battling our consciences.

Nice post,
-Gabriel

Aaron McIntosh said...

Well, since enough of the most obvious points relative to functionality, economy, sustainability and the future of craft have been established in the comments to this blog and your previous one, I will take another path: cultural context.

You make a careful, well versed analysis of the current state of the craft world in terms of business. You (and you are not the first) have predicted a death of craft because largely it has gotten too far away from it's sustainability in terms of dollars and cents. And, I think you have "missed the boat" of the changing role of Craft in our society and the world at large.

What if the craft world had remained insular in its rejection of mass-production (and thus popular culture), and not severed its ties to the traditions dictated by technique and functionality? What if the craft world still maintained its adherence to educational advantage, rewarding those whom were privileged enough to attend the relatively few craft programs around the world? What if the craft world still pandered exclusively to the upper crust?

A few answers:
The craft world would still be largely composed of over-educated European-descent men, with women and minorities and non-art school educated lingering in the ghettos of "folk" art. The omnipresence of functionality would have further embedded craft in a black hole of technical self-congratulation, alienating its potential cross-overs in other art fields. And capitalist-driven art practices might have driven away a bevy of makers for whom this was a corruption of artmaking.

For various reasons, though, the craft world rejected its reliance on traditions, technically, formally and culturally. The craft world, by and large, has chosen to open its doors and bring us all into the fold. Truthfully, this has been going on since the 1960s, but it has been of late, with the emergent "indy craft" and DIY culture, that craft has fully embraced (or at least acknowledged) its all-encompassing nature. The traditions limited access. Diversity in makers has only enriched our craft fields.

Surely this merging of differing ideas, concepts, materials and peoples in the craft world has benefitted us as makers in visible ways. I see craft culture and aesthetic everywhere I go. There are many reasons why craft is "hot" these days. Pay attention to those, and see how you might benefit from their successes in the culture and business markets. It's not just because things are handmade, it's also because there is a broad cultural aesthetic towards the "homespun" right now. Also remain critical of trendiness and hold true to your core understandings of making. I feel there is a certain pride in claiming craft/maker identity at this point in history. And honestly, the craft world has needed a big dose of true pride, and less inflated egos.

Concerning how we will make our livings:
I strongly believe there is an emergent call for the critical skills of makers to contribute to broader global discussions. Perhaps some of us will fill this role. Others of us are here in graduate school to begin careers in education. Still others will plunge into a studio practice when out of grad school and potentially make a living at it.